> Man,
> you absolutely are tearing this game up! it's a little bit of an unfair
> treatment. yes, there are some level design oddities but
but that's the point who here feels that a game should be more than good
graphics and sound? Look at the playstation, great use of cd tech (ie sound
and graphics) but so many of the games are unfun/boring to play.
some of the best games have ethier an addictive quality to them or a
compleing story shadow has neither!
> but the rest of the game is very well done and it just looks so sharp.
really
> crisp graphics. the backgrounds are so nicely polished.
how many times have we read a review that says "great graphics and sound but
after you get past that there is nothing left to keep you playing" it's like
a cake that looks great on the outside lots of icing, but the cake is hallow
theres' NOTHING GOOD INSIDE! We need to complain when games like this are
made so the publishers can (hopefully please god hopefully) learn from thier
mistakes so we can get games like splatterhouse, Ys, metal gear solid,
Half-life! Not shadow of the beast, the sega cd make your own video series,
or plumbers don't wear ties (man that last one was BAD)
does that mean i'll play a game with losey graphics? well yes if the
gameplay is easy enough to learn and is compelling i would
> i say, if the game is $25 or $30 you should get it! it's a definate
> challenge without the cheat code but it can be beaten.
what?? really you did i don't beleieve it !! :)
Underware man